|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
|
Green Plans in Action: France
French National Environmental Policy Plan What is le Grenelle?
While the six workgroups address discreet issues within an integrated framework, the Plan calls for two additional "intergroups" on Waste and genetically modified organisms (GMOs). Stakeholders include the State, employers, unions, local authorities, and non-government organizations (NGOs). Le Grenelle's diverse cross-section of 330 participants faces complex legal, social, budgetary, and technical obstacles, but has the benefit of national research bodies, public support and participation, and a charismatic public face in France's Minister of Ecology and Sustainable Planning, Jean-Louis Borloo. With parliament approval of Grenelle I in February 2009, Grenelle II, the Plan's technical application phase, faces a parliamentary hearing this month. What makes le Grenelle a Green Plan? The Round Table approach adopted by le Grenelle enables participation across public and private sectors, as well as civil society, through phase 1 workshops. Cooperation continues to inspire the Plan's following phases including phase 2, public debate; phase 3, round table discussions; and phase 4, new law and the establishment of implementation bodies. While the focus issues are limited, they are used as a framework to enable consideration of crosscutting implications for economic, environmental, and social needs. The resulting set of conclusions are fully integrated. The Round Table approach is informed at every level by its structure of six working groups covering energy management and climate change, biodiversity and natural resources, healthy environment, sustainable production and consumption behavior, ecological-responsible democracy (institutions and governance), as well as two intergroups on waste management and Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs). Further, the Plan's broad scientific base includes 330 participants covering the state, local government, NGOs, employers and employees, and support from applicable national research bodies. A report of final recommendations based on these extensive focus groups and cooperative work will go to the French President for decisions and action. The Round Table recommendations address the four focus issues through combined program proposals with associated targets for specified years (e.g. 2020). Programs or action plans include specified outcomes (e.g. a transition to high-level energy-efficiency regulations and 33% new construction of low-consumption or passive/positive-energy buildings must occur by 2010). The Plan identifies "associated measures" like the development of economic incentives as well as new implementation bodies emerging in parallel with further research. By committing to targeted environmental goals while simultaneously providing freedom for participants to develop diverse ways to reach the goals, le Grenelle displays the flexible structure typical of successful Green Plans. The Plan's emphasis on the role of the French President in catalyzing new law underscores le Grenelle's strategic management approach. Phase 4 follows presidential approval of roundtable discussions and emphasizes the creation of new law (e.g. Environmental Guidelines Act); a national monitoring committee; continuation of thematic workgroups on urban planning, housing, transport, waste management etc.; reorganization of the Ministry for Ecology, Sustainable Development and Spatial Planning; Action Programs; and annual meetings - all of which indicate a continuous process of setting goals, developing timelines, and monitoring and reporting on results. Further, the proposals make specific references to the involvement of the French Parliament, and the need for EU and international collaboration. With new laws already introduced in 2009, the purposeful, results-oriented initiative has the support of France's Ministers and President required to make France's environmental policy future sustainable. Le Grenelle's greatest challenge will be financial. The Plan refers, in some places, to Euros required, which shows that its authors recognize that achieving Le Grenelle is investment-intensive. However, the Plan will need to include more funding requirements and commitments through its ensuing phases for effective implementation. Current Developments: le Grenelle for the Oceans (Le Grenelle de la Mer) Current Challenges: a Snapshot |
||||||||